Although a “Cold War” is defined by Webster as a “conflict between two nations by means  of power politics short of violence,” the fact is that the Cold War between Russia and the  United States, declared in 1946 and officially ended in 1990 by a formal declaration of  friendship and a treaty calling for arms reduction, the forty-four years of the Cold War was  replete with war and revolution throughout the world. We had police actions such as the  Korean and Vietnam Wars, “brushfire wars”, and many other instances of armed conflict  between nations, such as the ongoing Arab-Israeli wars.

It is a triumph of Newspeak and mind control that we now look upon this forty-four year  period of conflict as a time in which we were spared the ravages of war. It is also a triumph  of the world Zionist movement, which was the driving force behind the many conflicts  which marked the Cold War years. The Cold War was never a bitter and relentless struggle  between the irreconcilable forces of capitalism and Communism; in fact, the leading  protagonists, the United States and Russia, were both governed by the principles of Karl  Marx, the founder of the world Communist movement. Both nations had enacted into law  the principles of the Commmunist Manifesto of 1848, including the progressive income  tax, a central bank, and compulsory public (not private or religious) education.

The tragedy of the Cold War is that it was an artificial conflict, created by the world Zionist  movement solely to ensure a continuous flow of military supplies from the United States to  Israel. These supplies were essential to the instant survival of Israel and to its expansionist  plans in the Middle East. It is amazing that this obvious fact of history is stated here for the  first time by anyone. One of the principal figures since the outset of the Cold War, James  V. Forrestal, the nation’s first Secretary of Defense, was ritually sacrificed by the Israelis  when he balked at stripping the United States of its arsenal and sending it to Israel. The  press featured stories that he was “mentally unstable”, preparing the public for his  “suicide”. His Successor, Robert A. Lovett, of the firm of Brown Brothers Harriman,  quickly acceded to any and all requests from the Israeli government. Yet Forrestal’s death  should have been the tipoff that the “Cold War” was from its outset a Zionist apparatchnik  operation. After all, Forrestal himself had commissioned George Kennan to author the  “containment plan” which duly appeared in Foreign Affairs, the official publication of the  Council on Foreign Relations, and which became the operating program for more than  forty years of the Cold War.

CHURCHILL’S CONFESSION

The Zionist direction of the Cold War was also apparent in the personage who was chosen  to officially launch it. Winston Churchill, an unemployed politician in England, was chosen  for this honor because of his flagrant but usually concealed Zionist sympathies. When he  declared the Cold War to be in effect, in his speech at Fulton College, in Missouri, on  March 5, 1946, he was speaking for the Zionist cause. Because Churchill was too clever to  openly state his longstanding Zionist commitment, in fifty years of research, I have found  only one reference to this central fact of his career. Abba Eban, for many years the Israeli  Ambassador to Washington, and one of the creators of the State of Israel, reveals in his  autobiography, Personal Witness: Israel Through My Eyes, Putnams, New York 1992,  quotes Churchill as jubilantly referring to “our Zionist cause”. On page 62, Eban tells us  that “Churchill had appointed a Cabinet committee under the chairmanship of Herbert  Morrison producing a proposal for the establishment of a Jewish state by 1944. If this  initiative had been adopted by the British Cabinet, World War II would have ended for  Zionism as triumphantly as had World War I. Churchill was so jubilant that he called  Weizmann (Chaim Weizmann, founder of Israel) to a meeting on Nov. 2, 1944 and said  triumphantly, ‘Our Zionist cause is going well. Moyne is now on our side.’ "

Note that Churchill, the Prime Minister of England, refers “jubilantly” to “our Zionist  cause”. This is the sole reference in Churchillian literature to this commitment. In many  volumes of history and millions of words written by Churchill, he never once reveals this  commitment. However, it was implicit in his public career after 1932. Bankrupt, he had  been recruited by Bernard Baruch to ensure a Second World War.

GERMANY DELENDA EST

In 1938, again facing bankruptcy, Churchill received a “loan” of 150,000 pounds (ten  million in today’s dollars) from Zionist banker Henry Strakosch, who then became his  personal adviser. Strakosch orchestrated Churchill’s program, “Germany delenda est”,  “Germany must be destroyed”. With the backing of the House of Rothschild, Churchill  single-handedly made the Second World War inevitable. After launching World War II, he  rejected peace overtures from Germany in 1940 and 1941, including the famous “peace  flight” of Rudolf Hess, who came as Adolf Hitler’s personal emissary to England to  persuade the British Goverment to join him in a crusade against Communism. Hess was  imprisoned, and Churchill became Stalin’s loyal ally.

REFUSAL TO FACE REALITY

It is indicative of the refusal of the American people to face reality that they refuse to  acknowledge that the man who plunged us into the Second World War and ensured the  establishment of the State of Israel, then launched the forty-four year Cold War to maintain  the United States as a heavily armed world power which could siphon off much of its  military armaments to the State of Israel to back Israel’s war against her Arab neighbors in  the Middle East. In my researches, I plowed through dozens of reference works to find the  origin of the term, “Cold War”. I found it, not in Webster’s or the Oxford English  dictionary, but in an obscure work, DICTIONARY OF TWENTIETH CENTURY  ALLUSIONS, by Cohn and Lass. These scholars reveal that the term “Cold War” originated  as a phrase written by Herbert Bayard Swope, publicist for Bernard Baruch, in 1946 for a  speech by Baruch. Thus the term was invented by a Jewish writer for a Jewish financier  and politician, both ardent Zionists.

In 1946, Winston Churchill divided the civilized world into two warring spheres, Russia  and the United States, for the sole purpose of guaranteeing his Zionist cohorts an unending  supply of weaponry from the American taxpayers. The Grand Design of Churchill’s  invention was soon bolstered by an elaborate world-wide system of political and military  alliances who aligned with either side. We set up the North Atlantic Treaty Organization,  NATO, which soon became the ruling power in Washington. It operated from Brussels under the leadership of Lord Carrington, a Rothschild relative, who recently presided over  the latest meeting of the Bilderberg group in Canada. He is also the partner of Henry  Kissinger in a wheeling-and-dealing international firm, Kissinger Associates. We also set  up the South Atlantic Treaty Organization, SATO, while the Russians organized the  Warsaw Pact among the Communist nations whom it controlled. To make the world picture  complete, undeveloped poor nations who could not afford the massive military  expenditures necessary to play a role in these large mythical and never-to-be-deployed  organizations, were relegated to a cast-off status as “Third World” nations, who could be  courted by either of the Cold War opponents.

ARAB TREACHERY

The most astounding development of the Cold War was the assignment of the Arab nations  to Moscow. Henceforth, they were enrolled among the Communist-influenced bloc of  nations, despite the fact that they were devoutly anti-Communist, and that members of the  Communist Party face execution in any Arab country. The raison d’etre behind this  amazing development was that the Jews had invaded and seized an Arab nation, Palestine,  and that all devout Moslems must now come to the aid of their religious brethren. The  Soviet Union would be the official backer of the Arab nations, and the United States would  officially back the State of Israel.

here now followed a series of Arab-Israeli wars. The Soviet Union provided the Arab  arteries with malfunctioning equipment, making it certain that the Arabs were always  defeated, and that Israel emerged a stronger and more confident presence in the Middle  East. The Arabs never seemed to catch on. Of course their leaders were controlled by  Washington, which in turn was controlled by Tel Aviv. The outcome could not have  surprised anyone who could see what was really going on.

During the early years of the Cold War, I believed, as did most Americans, that  Communism and the Soviet Union was the enemy. I was extremely anti-cornmunist and  anti-Soviet, as were all of my colleagues. Inevitably, we became anti-Zionist, because, as  Congressman Rankin pointed out on the floor of the House of Representatives “Ninety-five  per cent of American Communists are Jewish.” The Jews, as Stalin came to realize shortly  before his untimely death, at the hands of a group of Jewish physicians, that Jews could  never be pro-Communist, or pro-Russian, because their deeply held religious commitment  was to the nation of Israel.

By the early 195Os, I was speaking and writing prolifically on the Zionist apparat in the  United States and how it controlled the Washington government. I naively supposed that  the Arab nations, with their untold billions of oil revenues, mostly flowing from the United  States, would send funds to back my exposes of Zionism, and, for the expenditure of a few  thousand doIlars, alert the American people to the presence of the deadly enemy in their  midst. I sent copies of these works, with accompanying letters, to the various Arab  embassies in Washington. I never received any reply. At that time, I did not know, as has  been subsequently revealed, that the Federal Bureau of Investigation and the AntiDefamation League of B’Nai B’Rith, sometimes separately and sometimes jointly, routinely performed “black bag” entries into the Arab embassies and photocopied all of  their papers. My letters went to the ADL offices in New York.

Because of this control, neither I nor anyone who worked to combat Zionist subversion in  the United States, ever received one cent from any Arab source. Even the Arabs in the  United States, many of whom had become millionaire businessmen, did not dare contribute  anything to this work. Their names would promptly be reported to the ADL, and their  businesses would be destroyed. Thus the Arabs were powerless to counteract Zionist  activities in the United States. Had they been able to launch a counter-offensive here, the  specter of Zionism could have been defeated.

ZIONIST ATROCITIES

Of the many exposes documenting Israel’s reign of terror in the Middle East, one of the  most shocking is Ralph Schoenman’s THE HIDDEN HISTORY OF ZIONISM (Veritas  Press, Santa Barbara, CA). Schoenman points out that the Zionist slanders of the Arabs as  barbarians is countermanded by the fact that “During the Dark Ages in Europe,  mathematics and philosophy were preserved by Arab scholars. The Zionist movement  subdued Palestine and assaulted its culture with a relentless barbarity shocking even to  those familiar with the crual annals of colonial conquest.”

Schoenman points out (p.1) “The Dec; 21, 1987 general strike of the Palestine community.  The Israeli response to the uprising was brutal. Defense Minister Yitzhak Rabin ordered the  use of tanks, armored vehicles and automatic rifles against an unarmed population. The act  of brutality which most inflamed the Palestinian people was the army seizure of the  wounded from hospital beds. Palestinian children seeking powdered milk at United Nations  depots were shot at and beaten with sticks."

All of these atrocities were paid for by the American taxpayer. These atrocities were  justified by Israel on the grounds that they had suffered in the Holocaust. But the  Palestinian children whom they massacred had taken no part in the Holocaust. Schoenman  points out (p. 16) “the myth that Zionism is the moral legatee of the victims of the  Holocaust. The bitter and cruel irony of this false claim is that the Zionist movement itself  actively colluded with Nazism from its inception. Mussolini set up squadrons of the  Revisionist Zionist Youth movement, Betar, in black shorts in emulation of his own Fascist  bands. When Menachem Begin became chief of Betar, he preferred the brown shirts of the  Hitler gangs, a uniform which Begin and Betar wore to all meetings, at which they greeted  each other with the fascist salute. In 1937, the Labor “socialist” Zionist militia, the  Haganah, founded by Jabotinsky, sent an agent, Feivel Folkes, to Berlin offering to spy for  the S.S. Security Service in exchange for the release of Jewish wealth for Zionist  colonization. Adolf Eichmann was invited to Palestine as the guest of the Haganah. S.S.  General Kurt Becher was appointed Commissar of all Nazi concentration camps by  Heinrich Himmler. He was never tried, and after the war headed up the sale of wheat to  Israel. His corporation, the Cologne-Handel Gesellschaft, did extensive business with the  Israeli government.” (P. 94).

ALWAYS A MINORITY

Although the Zionists claimed that God had promised them Palestine in an unbreakable  covenant, they never offered any explanation of the fact that they had always been a  minority there. They had never engaged in business or agriculture until the Rothschilds  financed them in the late nineteenth century. One source, ISRAEL: HISTORY UNTIL 1880  (p. 230): “At that time (the 19th century) the Jews lived mainly on charity received from  abroad.” Not until they seized the farms and businesses of the native Arab population did  they engage in commerce with their stolen goods.

The most authoritative documentation of the Zionist presence in Palestine is found in Israel  by Time Life Books, 1985. On p.24 we find that “At the beginning of 1948, when  Independence was declared, the Jewish population of Palestine was estimated at six  hundred thousand; the non-Jewish (Arab) population of Palestine on the eve of  Independence was about 1,800,000. ” At the time of the 1948 Israeli seizure of Palestine,  the Zionists were a minority, comprising one third of the total population! How did they  succeed against vastly greater numbers? The answer, in one word, is “terrorism”. Israel is  the only nation in the world founded exclusively on terrorist acts. Abba Eban points out in  Personal Witness that Lord Moyne, who was sympathetic to the Zionist cause, was  murdered by Lechi, a splinter group of Menachem Begin’s Irgun Zvai Leumi, a terrorist  gang. He was murdered in Cairo in 1944. Count Bernadotte, then appointed U.N.  negotiator in Palestine, was also murdered by Lechi. The Zionists blew up the King David  Hotel, kidnapped and tortured British soldiers before murdering them, and then boobytrapped their bodies, killing more British who sought only to give their comrades Christian  burial. These atrocities caused anti-Jewish riots in London, which were quickly put down  by the British Government.

NEO-CONSERVATIVE FRONT IN THE U.S.

To prevent the American people from learning about Zionist atrocities against the Arab  peoples, the Zionists set up a nationwide front in the United States, which called itself “the  neo-conservative” movement headed by Norman Podhoretz, editor of Commentary, the  magazine published by the American Jewish Committee in New York, the NeoConservatives were actually disgruntled Jewish Socialists who had left the Communist  Party after Stalin ordered the murder of Leon Trotsky. The Trotskyite Communists  concealed their ties to the Communist Party, and masqueraded as "Conservatives” in the  United States. Althougth Commentary was their principal outlet, they also founded many  other publications, such as National Review, and one of their leaders, Martin Peretz,  persuaded the heiress to the Singer sewing machine fortune to abandon her husband. He  then married her, and used her money to buy the New Republic, which also became a  Zionist propaganda operation. However, the principal Zionist propagandists in the United  States remained the major networks, and the Jewish-owned newspapers, such as  Sulzberger’s New York Times, and the Meyer family’s Washington Post.

ZIONISM AND THE CIA

A principal weapon of the Zionists in the United States was the CIA. Bob Woodward, in  Veil; The Secret Wars of the CIA 1981-87 notes on p. 161, “The CIA had secret PLO  sources that at times provided operational details about PLO attacks in Israel.” The result  was that the CIA turned this information over to Mossad, which then wiped out the PLO  attackers. Veil continues, “Before 1974, the celebrated CIA chief of counterintelligence,  James Jesus Angleton, had run the Israeli desk at the agency, keeping vital information  from the Middle East operations people and analysts. Even after Angleton was fired, all  lsraeli intelligence was viewed for years as little more than a Mossad press release,  designed to serve Israel’s political goals.”

On p. 355, Woodward informs us that “Casey (William Casey, head of the CIA) had  leverage with Israel. He had given the Israelis broader access to U.S. satellite  reconnaisance photos than they had previously enjoyed.”

The close collaboration between the CIA and Israel was duly praised by the neoconservatives, who filled the pages of their publications with paeans in praise of their  favorite stooges, notably Jeane Kirkpatrick, U.S.Ambassador to the United Nations, and  Margaret Thatcher, Conservative Prime Minister of England. When he retired from the  editorship of Commentary in 1996, Norman Podhoretz published a book,  NeoConservatism; A Eulogy, congratulating himself on a job well done. He boasts that  “Neoconservatism was created to help Israel take advantage of the Cold War. Our work is  now done.”  This is a frank admission that the mythical “Cold War” was never anything but a Zionist  operation. Now that this “war” is over, Neoconservatism has no further mission in the  United States. Nevertheless, it will probably continue as a useful propaganda outlet for  Israel.

MARGARET THATCHER

Today, Margaret Thatcher, former Prime Minister of England, is paid a handsome lecture  fee of $100,000 per speech in the United States. This is a payoff from the State of Israel.  Although she never reveals her Zionist sympathies in these speeches, she did expose the  Zionist bias of her administration when her mentor, Sir Keith Joseph, recently died in  England. In her eulogy to him, she declared that he had been the sole architect of her entire  administration. She did not add that he was the son of Sir Abraham Joseph, who had been  the principal contractor for the House of Rothschild’s many commercial developments in  England, amassing a large fortune for himself, which allowed his son to devote his time to  “public service”.

Margaret Thatcher’s speech to the Congress of Prague was recently reprinted in the Wall  Street Journal, on the op-ed page, May 14, 1996. Under the heading, “The West After the  Cold War”, Thatcher cites the Congress of Vienna in 1815, but fails to mention that at this  Congress, to celebrate their victory over Napoleon, the Rothschilds asserted their mastery  over Europe. [See The World Order by Eustace Mullins.] Her description of the Cold War,  which she genuinely seems to miss, noted “First of all, there was a kind of unholy  symmetry in international affairs, created by a balance of terror. The breakdown of Soviet  power brought that discpline to an end.”

Here again we find an open admission that the governments of the Free World,  manipulated by the Zionists, kept their citizens terrified, in order to tax them for armaments  for Israel. It is now estimated that during the Cold War, no less than ten per cent of the  annual defense budget of the United States, ranging from ten billion to twenty-five billion a  year, was secretly siphoned off to Israel. Most of these “donations” were entered in the  records as going to other recipients, most of whom transhipped them directly to Israel.

Margaret Thatcher was openly regarded with contempt in England because of her  subservience to Israel. In her speech to the Congress of Prague she longs, for “that  discipline” of the Cold War on which she and her American counterparts founded their  long and lucrative carerrs. The Zionists are the masters of terrorism; how they have  delighted in terrorizing the people of England and the United States during the long  decades of the Cold War.

Despite her success in implementing the program of the house of Rothschild in England,  Margaret Thatcher’s long reign as Prime Minister won her few friends there. She was  recently memorialized by Thedore Dalrymple in the Spectator, Feb 10, 1996. He says that  Margatet Thatcher “had rather less success with her own country, of course, which is just  as she found it; grey and grubby, supporting an atrociously dressed population with an  insatiable appetite for the most footling entertainments.”

On a recent visit to London, I was shocked by the drabness of this Zionist-ruled country,  which seemed distinctly Third World in the shabby clothing, rundown infrastructure, and  tired demeanour of its people.

MINISTRY OF FEAR

Throughout the Cold War, the governments of England and the United States functioried as  a Ministry of Fear for their luckless citizens, constantly terrifying them with horror stories  of the terrible fate which awaited them if they did not continue to turn over most of their  earnings to the “government”, which, of course, was the “Zionist Occupation Government”  or ZOG as it is more popularly known. While the Thatchers and the Kennans long for the  “good old days” of universal terror, we are reminded by a series of recent deaths that the  terrorism of the Cold War is still claiming its victims. The unexplained death of Vincent  Foster, Secretary of Commerce Ron Brown, Chief of Naval Operations Admiral Boorda,  and former CIA head William Colby remind us that Zionist terrorism is still very much  with us. Vincent Foster’s “suicide” brought revelations that he had amassed millions of  dollars in payoffs for his espionage work for the State of Israel, now secreted in Swiss bank  accounts; Ron Brown’s fortuitous demise removed a principal threat to Bill Clinton’s  reelection campaign. Sean Wilentz hailed him in the April 15, 1996 New Yorker as “The  Fixer as Statesman” describing Brown as “Silky, shrewd, and extremely self-confident,  Secretary of Commerce Ronald H. Brown was one of the premier Washington fixers of the  modern era.” Wilentz reminds us that Brown was the personal protege of Vernon Jordan, Washington’s leading black insider, who recently appeared as a principal at the  Bilderberger Conference in Canada, and that Brown had been chief aide to Senator Teddy  Kennedy in Washington. Wilentz reminds us that Brown “brokered billions of dollars  worth of foreign deals for American companies.” This was precisely the basis for the many  federal investigations into his activities, which have now been closed

STORMY WEATHER

When the news came that Ron Brown’s plane had crashed in Yugoslavia on April 3, 1996,  Hillary Clinton rushed to explain in her newspaper column that the crash hid been caused  by “a violent rainstorm”. Both Time and Newsweek described it as “the worst storm of the  decade”. These Establishment claims were immediately countermanded by Aviation Week,  which denied that there had been a violent rainstorm. On June 7, 1996, Maj. Gen. Charles  Coolidge, president of the Air Force Investigating Committee into the Ron Brown Plane  Crash, stated on C-Span that “The weather was not a substantial contributing factor in the  accident.” The Air Force now attributes the crash to “pilot error”, since the pilots are  unable to defend themselves. Although a stewardess, Shelly Kelly, survived the crash with  minor injuries, Media Bypass states that she later died at the hospital from loss of blood, a  neat three-inch incision over her femoral artery. Clinton hastily ordered the bodies of the  victims to be cremated, to “sanitize the area” as was done at Waco and Oklahoma City.

COLBY AND OPERATION PHOENIX

Another recent victim of the Cold war is William Colby, former head of the CIA. He was  found drowned near his bay hideaway, although his widow said he was in excellent health  and a very good swimmer. He had left his dinner on the table in order to take a swim, no  doubt being aware of admonitions not to swim immediately after eating. Disinformation is  now being circulated from Washington that he was probably done in by some of the old  CIA hands, who were offended by some of his remarks about the CIA in Congressional  testimony. This indicates a loyalty among the members of the. “Old boy” CIA network  which does not exist.

During his tenure in Vietnam, William Colby embarked on an ambitious program to secure  for the CIA complete control of drug operations in Southeast Asia. Operation Phoenix  resulted in the execution of sixty-eight thousand Vietnamese who were active in the drug  trade, although the figure released by the CIA is usually only twenty thousand. In  retirement, Colby relaxed his personal security, ignoring the fact that some twenty-five  thousand Vietnamese now live within a few miles of the CIA headquarters. Washington  observers believe that the sons of some of the victims of Operation Phoenix in Vietnam had  stalked Colby for months, biding their time until they could dispose of him at their leisure.  Certainly this is much more logical than the mythical “loyalty” of former CIA officials.

BOORDA’S SUICIDE

The reputed suicide of Admiral Jeremy M. (Mike) Boorda, Chief of Naval Operations,  shocked all of those who believe in the American dream. The son of Ukrainian Jewish immigrants, who owned the only dress shop in the little town of Momence, Illinois,  Boorda’s rise from enlisted man to Admiral, to the most important job in the Navy, CNO,  had been meteoric. This was the more striking because, with his five-foot-four-inch stature,  he was hardly a commanding military presence. In fact, his meteoric rise may have been  due more to his connections than to his ability, as we shall presently explain.

The explanation of this suicide by President Clinton and other saddened Washington  admirers of Admiral Boorda was that he had worn some combat decorations which he may  not have been entitled to display. However, Naval authorities have issued conflicting  reports as to whether he had been in violation of any rules about the V stars displayed on  his ribbons. In any case, his sudden suicide because of the question raised indicates a  sensitivity which had been remarkably lacking in his personality. The Navy is not a place  for shrinking violets, and delicate pansies do not thrive in the harsh atmosphere which is  traditional aboard ship.

LOYALTY TO ISRAEL

As a lifelong Zionist, Admiral Boorda hated the traditional office corps of the United States  Navy, with its code of gentlemanly conduct and its hallowed Annapolis esprit de corps of  the Naval Academy. As Chief of Naval Operations, he launched a campaign of sabotage  against the Navy, seeking to destroy its officer corps. As one who sought to demoralize the  military establishment, he was greatly admired by President Clinton and his White House  crew of fanatical Zionists. However, as CRIMINAL POLITICS points out (May 1996) “He  was universally hated among the officer corps.”

Had they known more about his background, the officer corps would have hated him even  more. Admiral Boorda “committed suicide” a few minutes before he was to be interviewed  by a Newsweek correspondent. He had been tipped off that he would be asked two  questions: Did he know Jonathan Jay Pollard? And, was he Pollard’s “handler” at the Navy  Department?

POLLARD: MASTER SPY

Jonathan Jay Pollard fled arrest by the FBI on December 12, 1985. He was followed to the  Israeli Embassy in Washington where, after hasty communication with Tel Aviv, he was  denied asylum. Israel was not about to endanger its “special relationship” with the United  States to the tune of many billions a year in “aid”. Pollard was then arrested by the FBI on  charges of selling official United States codes to Israel for $50,000. These codes were  worth literally billions of dollars; they were cheap at $50,000. They included many Top  Secret codes, including SIGINT and IMINT, the key to our entire national defense strategy.

Pollard was the son of Morris Pollard, a famous cancer-researcher at the University of  Notre Dame. He had been privy to the innermost secrets of the Department of the Navy, all  of which he considered legitimate goods for sale. His wife was also charged with  possession of confidential documents. Although it was never brought out at his trial,  Pollard was a member of a twenty-eight man Israeli spy ring in the Navy Department

called “nesher” (Hebrew for ‘eagle’). This cell was a spinoff of the nesher cell at the  Department of Justice which had been set up by Philip Klutznick in 1936 and which runs  the entire Dept. of Justice. Most government departments in Washington subsequently set  up nesher cells, but the Navy Department, thanks to Pollard’s talent for intrigue, soon  gained access to our most important defense secrets. During the heyday of Pollard’s  espionage, Mike Boorda had risen rapidly in the Bureau of Naval Personnel. His position  was ideal for the master of a spy ring. He could protect his operatives, and move them up to  even more sensitive positions. This nesher cell orchestrated the “Tailhook” scandal to  demoralize the entire U.S. Navy.

In what proved to be a masterful coverup, Pollard never exposed any of his fellowconspirators during his trial. He contended that he had acted alone, which was manifestly  impossible, as every door at the Navy Department had been opened to him by higher-ups,  such as a high offtcal in the Bureau of Naval Personnel. Pollard was sentenced to life  without parole. He is regarded in Israel as a national hero, and Washington insiders state  that Clinton had definitely agreed to pardon Pollard after the November elections.

THE NEWSWEEK ORDEAL

The Establishment-approved version of Admiral Boorda’s suicide is that he could not face  being asked about the decorations he had worn, and that suicide was the only way out. This  ignored the fact that Boorda had removed the decorations months before, when a question  was raised about them, and that he was not wearing them. The inside story is that although  Boorda had been tipped off that he would be asked about the Pollard association, he had  only to deny it, and it would probably not appear in the printed interview. However,  Mossad, informed of the approaching interview, decided that it would cancel Clinton’s  prospective pardon of Pollard if the question was raised at all. In accordance with their  policy of “minimizing risks”, Tel Aviv ordered that the interview not take place. A Mossad  operative followed Boorda, shot him in the chest, and went on his way.

Of the various “suicides”, also known as “Washington suicides” which have taken place in  Washington, nearly all of them have had a Zionist connection. The Zionists believe in  “cleaning the slate”. A serious problem must be disposed of quickly and cleanly. A suicide  is the accepted solution. And of them all, Boorda’s is the most unbelievable. We are asked  to accept that Boorda could not face a simple question, “Why did you take off the  decorations?“, and that he chose to shoot himself in the chest, a very rare occurrence in  suicide. Clinton’s crocodile tears for his departed hero mingle with his tears for the fortytwo other associates who have departed this vale of tears during his colorful political  career. There will be more in the future.

MASS MURDER

The forty-four years of the Cold War were years of unrelieved horror, marked by repeated  massacres of helpless men and children, and by the annual ingathering of more and more of  the world’s goods into Zionists’ rapacious hands. The tragedy of the Cold War is not  merely that we do not understand it; we have learned nothing from it. We are ready for a new Cold War to terrorize us, so that we can continue to hand over our possessions to the  Zionists. Tel Aviv has decreed that the 1996 elections shall be fought solely on such issues  as abortion, affirmative action, welfare, Medicare, and balancing the budget. This ignores  all of the real issues facing the American people. Most important, it ignores the religious  issue. The Zionists have a religious mission: to make Israel, a theocracy, the ruler of the  world.

GOD’S WILL

We need to face the basic issue, that God did not send His Only Son to Earth to be  crucified on the Cross at the demand of mocking Jews, or to have His People enslaved  forever by the Jews. Our enslavement by the Jews remains a daily insult to God. It is a  mockery of God’s Purpose for us. Christ was sent to us as our only opporttunity for  redemption. If we continue to reject God’s offer, our punishment will not only be continued  slavery, but punishments so terrible we cannot imagine them.

Today, Edgar Bronfman, the King of the Jews, president of the World Jewish Congress,  stands astride the world as Satan’s Consul, the new King Herod. Soon he will demand the  slaughter of our firstborn sons. We can continue to be enslaved by liquor smugglers and  drug dealers only if we wish to continue to insult God. God is not mocked. He is sad,  because he wanted so much for us, and we have rejected Him.

The horrors of the Cold War are but a harbinger of the terrible fate which awaits us here on  Earth. But we still have a chance. We can act immediately to punish the Cold War  conspirators. We can end the mockery of God which the presence of the State of Israel  flaunts in His face. And, at long last, we can accept God’s Plan for His People on Earth. Or  we can go on, in misery, ignorance, and sloth, until death ends our failure here. You must  choose for yourself, as this too is part of God’s Plan for us. Seize the day!

Source: ZioPedia.org