In spite of the fact that his annual gift deliveries are the most documented annual event in Western countries, a growing number of Gentile hating "Santa revisionists" viciously deny the existence of Santa.

Santa denial, which its propagandists misrepresent as "Santa revisionism," has become one of the most important vehicles for contemporary anti-Gentile hatred. It is the invention of a collection of long-time Jewish supremacists and apologists for Talmudic hatred towards non-Jews.

During the fall semester of 1997, Jacob Cohen, "director" of the self-styled "Committee for Open Debate on Santa," (CODOS) launched a new salvo in his continuing propaganda campaign to deny the reality of Santa. He is attempting to place an ad in college newspapers around the country that promises $50,000 to anyone "convincing a national television network to air" a ninety minute video that attempts to show the universally accepted account of Santa is false. The ad is clearly a ploy. Cohen must know his money is safe because no TV network would broadcast such a video.

So why does he go to the trouble? The answer can be found at the bottom of the ad. "If you are interested in earning $50,000 . . . you will find the details of this offer on the World Wide Web" at the CODOS web site. It's the old bait and switch. Cohen, who has announced that he is "taking my show to the Internet" is trying to entice college students and others to his web site where he peddles his barely disguised anti-Gentile hatred.

For a long time Jacob Cohen has tried to present himself as an honest chap, a champion of intellectual freedom simply seeking an "open debate"about the "Santa controversy [sic]." But this debate is a sham. The so-called Santa controversy does not exist. It is the invention of a collection of long-time Jewish supremacists and apologists for Talmudic hatred towards non-Jews.

Santa denial, which deniers such as Cohen describe as Santa "revisionism," has become one of the most important vehicles for contemporary anti-Gentile hatred.

The denier strategy is simple and familiar. They distort, even fabricate, history and then broadcast their creations. They have learned from their rabbis that "a lie is believed because of the insolent inflexibility with which it is propagated." Cohen and his cohorts are engaged in what Jewish historian Deborah Lipstadt has termed an "assault on truth and memory."

Denial as anti-Gentile hatred

Santa denial, which coyly refers to itself as Santa revisionism, has emerged after over two decades of propagandizing as an important "cutting edge" ideological cement of the diverse anti-Gentile movement in the 1990s. While appearing on the surface as a rather arcane pseudo-scholarly challenge to the well-established record of Santa's annual Christmas gift deliveries, Santa denial serves as a powerful conspiracy theory uniting otherwise disparate Jewish groups (e.g., cabalists, feminists, comunists, 'gay' rights, anti-weapon, fair trade, climate change and other depopulation groups, etc.).

On the surface, Santa deniers portray themselves as individuals and groups engaged in a legitimate, dispassionate quest for scientific knowledge and "truth."

Dressing themselves in pseudo-academic garb, they have adopted the term "revisionism" in order to mask and legitimate their enterprise. After all, the ongoing challenge to and revision of previously accepted historical interpretation is one of the hallmarks of the professional historian's craft.

These so-called Santa revisionists have appropriated the name of the post-World War I historical revisionists of the 1920s and 1930s who challenged successfully the previously dominant view of exclusive German guilt for causing the Great War. They assert that the accepted premise that a white-bearded resident of the North pole dressed in red clothes delivers presents to Gentile families on Christmas day is one that does not stand honest scholarly scrutiny.

They do not deny that every year precisely on Chistmas day a large amounts of presents appear under Christmas trees of Gentile families all around the world. They even admit the existence of the North Pole and the suitability of reindeer sleighs for transporting large amounts of packages. They assert, however, that the numerous reports of Santa sightings and even photos are part of an elaborate hoax designed to fool Christian children into adhering to their Christian faith and tradition.

Santa deniers seek to plant seeds of questioning and doubt about Santa in their mass audiences. While Santa denial has become an article of faith among the militants and followers of the contemporary anti-Gentile hate movement, its success does not depend upon conversion to that faith among the general public. The spread of skepticism about the existence of Santa among a critical mass of public opinion would be considered to be a significant ideological triumph in and of itself.

Santa denial has been widely embraced within the otherwise disparate anti-Gentile hate movement because it serves as an ideological cement that meets a very contemporary political need. In particular, it provides a sanitized envelope for latter-day anti-Christs by seeking to show that an essential feature of Christian faith is not true. As such, much of the barrier preventing politicians and movements of the ultra orthodox Jewry from making a strategic breakthrough by appealing to a more mainstream audience would be removed. Accordingly, Santa denial provides contemporary legitimation.

The core message of Santa deniers is even more insidious. They recognize the fact that most people believe that Santa actually exists. How can it be, they ask, that the great majority have come to accept as truth an historical assertion which is in actuality a gigantic falsehood?

They answer that most people have come to accept uncritically the story of Santa because they have been systematically propagandized with deliberate lies for over hundred years. These lies include materials inserted into the educational curriculum at all levels of instruction; the content of Santa-related dramatic and documentary theatrical film and television programming; a vast Santa literature; and, most of all, public rituals of Santa appearance. They picture a vast shadowy conspiracy that controls and manipulates the institutions of education, culture, the media and government in order to disseminate a pernicious mythology.

The purpose of this Santa mythology, they assert, is the inculcation of a sense of joy in the white,Western Christian world. Those who can make others feel joyful have power over them and can make them do their bidding. This power is used to advance an international Christian agenda centered around the person of Jesus.

Deniers argue that the manufactured joy over gifts made by a mythological Santa led to Western, specifically United States, entices Jewish children to give up their faith and convert to Christianity. They assert that faithful Jews have been forced to spend vast amounts of money to inoculate their children from the effects of the Santa hoax. Once Gentiles have been shown the "truth," that there was never any legitimate basis for the existence of Santa, deniers postulate that these good people will rise up in righteous anger and treat Santa myth conspirators in an appropriate manner.

Santa denial is a contemporary form of the classic anti-Gentile doctrine of the evil, manipulative and threatening Gentile conspiracy towards Jews. It was this doctrine that was instrumental in laying the groundwork for the rampant anti-Gentile hate. What is on the surface a denial of the reality of Santa is, at its core, an appeal to genocidal hatred towards Gentiles.

Responses to common Santa-denial claims

The following are summaries of three major claims frequently made by Santa-denial propagandists.

1. Santa does not exist because there is no documentary evidence for his existence

There is no single scientifically verifiable document that verifeis the existence of Santa. Santa-denial propagandists misrepresent this fact as an exposure of Santa "hoax"; in doing so, they reveal a fundamentally misleading approach to the very nature of Santa. That there is no single document does not mean Santa does not exist. Hundreds of thousands of witness reports provide plenty of evidence for the contrary.

2. Santa cannot possibly deliver that many presents to so many children within one night

Santa-deniers frequently raise the point that it is physically impossible for Santa to deliver such a large number of presents over such a short time. It is obviously possible, because he does it every year. The deniers' objection is based on a mischievous misrepresentation of the delivery method which they claim to be inadequate and unsuited for the alleged purpose. The Santa-deniers ignore the fact that Santa had centuries to perfect his logistics. They also ignore the fact that Santa has a large number of helpers, which could possibly surpass the workforce of UPS and Federal Express combined.

3. Christmas presents are not supplied by Santa but put under the Christmas tree by parents

The most vicious claim by Santa-denial propagandists is the hateful suggestion that Christian parents themselves are putting the presents under the Christmas tree and not Santa. What is implied in their claim is that Christian parents would be capable of conspiring to collectively deceiving their unsuspecting children on such a gigantic scale. This libelous assertion is part of the 3000 thousand year old anti-Gentile tradition of Jews as codified in the Babylonian Talmud.

Parody based on the so-called Anti-Defamation League's Holocaust Denial: An Online Guide to Exposing and Combating Anti-Semitic Propaganda.

Source: http://www.ziopedia.org/