In a letter to the editor of the 'Christian Science Monitor', David A. Harris, Executive Director of the American Jewish Committee fumes: [1]
Regarding John Whitbeck's Sept. 14 Opinion piece, "Palestine: Democracy Not Zionism": the author twists Zionism, the Jewish quest for self-determination, into a demonic force, seeking to disqualify the Jewish people from a right to national sovereignty. But that right was recognized by the United Nations and reflected recognition of the ancient link between Jews and the land, and a belief that two states – Arab and Jewish – should live side by side.Alas, Israel's neighbors opposed the coexistence it sought. When Egypt and Jordan later stepped forward, they found Israel was an eager peace partner. And Israel's repeated efforts to make peace with the Palestinians have underscored its sincerity.
But it takes two to tango, and Israel's partner has been largely absent. Yet, rather than assign any responsibility to the Palestinians, Mr. Whitbeck proposes the dissolution of Israel as we know it. If this is what he has been counseling, as an adviser to the Palestinian negotiating team, no wonder the talks have not succeeded.
Being the Master of the Order of the Forked Tongue that he is, Harris defines Zionism as a 'Jewish quest for self-determination'. That is about as absurd of the excuse of a bank robber that he just doing his job as the provider for his family.
Nobody disqualifies the 'Jewish people' - if there is such a thing - from a right to national sovereignty. What we disqualify it is the right to invade another people's country and disown and kick out the locals.
Yes, the United Nations recognised Israel by accepting it as a member. But let's not forget about the not to minor detail that this was based on the condition that Israel allows ALL Palestinians that fled from the Jewish terrorists to return to their home country.
And what about that 'ancient link between Jews and the land'? Modern Jewry consists of three distinct ethnic groups: Ashkenazi (90%), Sephardi (7%) and Oriental (3%) Jews. The Ashkenazis are the descendants of the ethnic Turk Mongolian tribe of the Khazars that raped and pillaged Europe as part of Attila's hordes. They only became Jews when their kings got embarrassed about their traditional phallus cult. They only picked Judaism because they wanted to preserve their independence from their Christian and Muslim rivals. The Sephardi have no link to Palestine either. They are the descendants of a North African Berber tribe that converted to Judaism in the 6th century. Only the Oriental Jews are the direct descendants of Roman days Israelites, and so are the Palestinians.
Harris' hypocritical claim that Israel seeks peace but lacks of partners on the sides of the Palestinians is almost too dishonest to even deserve to be rebuked. What kind of negotiations does he have in mind where Israel murders, imprisons, tortures or sabotages any Palestinian leader whose attitude it dislikes? In my books that's not negotiations, but a dictate, and history has proven that dictates never lead to peace.
What Harris and his fellow land robbers have in mind is an 'Indian solution' for the Palestinians. Locking them up in heavily guarded Zoo-like enclaves, too small and too disjointed to function as a proper state and dependent on Israeli hand-outs in return for obedience.
Being the Jewish supremacists that they are, the Zios cannot possibly imagine living side by side in peace in a free, united, egalitarian, secular Palestine. And quite frankly, I can't imagine them doing that either.
On the other hand, how can the Palestinians be possibly expected to live door to door with their tormentors of 60 years? But that's their decision. Personally I can only see one fair and practical solution to the Israel problem, and that's a 'judenreine' one-state solution, ie. the forced or voluntary immigration of all Jews.
Related Articles:
Israel's right to exist
