The Rebel

Sunday, Feb 12th

Last update06:00:00 AM

You are here:

Rebel News needs your help!

Dear Reader,
We urgently need to raise the US$200 that we are still owing for February's web hosting fee, the equivalent of four paid annual subscriptions. If you aren't a paying subscriber already and haven't donated recently, please do so now or risk seeing Rebel News disappearing off the net on 12 February.
Your Aussie Rebel

Apostle Paul and the Jewish Dark Art of Gatekeeping

  • PDF
conversion of saint paul
Conversion of Saint Paul

One of the most disturbing phenomenons of Western civilisation is that almost all aspects of society are dominated, in one form or another, by Jews. It would be naïve, bordering to stupidity, to believe that this is a mere coincidence, as the Satanic B'nai B'rith's Anti-Defamation League and other arms of the Kosher Inquisition want us to think. I call it a Jewincidence, a ‘coincidence’ that is ‘good for the Jews’, like the Jewincidence that of the 3,000 victims of the attacks on the New York Twin Towers only a couple were Jews. You would think that's impossible in a city where you can't throw a stone without hitting a Jew. Honi soit qui mal y pense.[1]

For those of us who have at least started to develop a degree of blue pill resistance, there is obviously something foul in the State of Denmark. Some red pillers like myself go even as far as suspecting method behind above mentioned phenomenon. But don’t take my word for it. Read Professor Kevin Macdonald’s ground breaking analysis of this matter titled ‘Culture of Critique’.

There is obviously an ‘evolutionary benefit’ for the Tribe that likes to see the world from a 'survival of the fittest' point of view in dominating all aspects of human society, especially when it comes to political discourse. It means that other members of the same group won’t touch on any topic that could hurt one of the many sensitivities of their Jewish bedfellows, like the question whether the internationally guaranteed right of return applies to Palestinian refugees and their descendants, whether freedom of expression covers the right to freely investigate and discuss the true events of the Jewish Holocaust, or whether Jews were behind or actively involved in the false flag terrorist attacks on September 11.

This Jewish strategy of systematically suppressing discourse that is ‘bad for the Jews’ is not new. It goes back as far as the Roman days, if not further. The first Jewish gatekeeper I can think of is a man known to Christians as Apostle or Saint Paul. He, and not Jesus, is the founder of Christianity. Paul of Tarsus, a Hellenistic Jew, was a leading henchman of the Jewish sect of the Pharisees, the predecessors of today’s rabbis. Before baptising as a sign that he has become a follower of Jesus, he was actively involved in the first systematic persecution of Christians organized by the Pharisees. To that stage, Jesus’ movement was nothing more than a revolt against the heretic ‘oral tradition’ of the Pharisees, who had put their teachings above the word of God as written down in the Bible or Torah.[2]

What Apostle Paul did in a school book case of Jewish gatekeeping is redirect the missionary effort of Jesus’ followers away from the Jews towards the disadvantaged of Roman society, that is women, soldiers and slaves. He promised them that they will go to heaven if they sheepishly obey their superiors, while their oppressors go to hell. How convenient for the latter. It didn’t take the Roman leadership very long to realise how useful Christianity was for keeping their sheeples quiet and make it the official state religion. The atypical persecution of Christians under Emperor Nero were not part of a systematic oppression of the fast growing Christian faith, but the result of the skillful lobbying by his Christian-hating wife, who Jewincidentally was a Jewress.

Footnotes:
[1] French for 'A scoundrel, who thinks badly by it', or 'Shame on him, who suspects illicit motivation'.
[2] I’m referring here to the Torah in the inner sense which doesn’t include the Talmud, the codification of the oral tradition which occured only after the destruction of the Jerusalem temple in 70 A.D.

Recommended reading:
Douglas Reed, Controversy of Zion
Michael Hoffman, Judaism discovered

Comments (7)
  • Alan

    For ill-informed christians, you need to understand that the nation of Ysryl was DIVIDED by the time Mashayah arrived on the scene. There were some Hebrews (the word 'jew' did not exist then) living in the land then, but many others had relocated to other locations, including West Africa, that were under Gentile rule (the writings of Hebrew-historian Flavius Yosephus).

    In fact, the Northern Kingdom and Southern Kingdoms had become so splintered that the Southern Kingdom members:Yahuda, Benyamin, referred to their brethren of the now-divided Northern by the derogatory term: "gentile"; because they had begun living like Gentiles and practicing their customs; at any rate, they and had to be found. Read about the city of Nineveh and you will discover the same situation of Hebrews living amongst strangers and WHY Yonah was sent there.....

    Hence Shaul's notification: he became the Apostle to the "gentiles". So now you should better understand why Mashayah said HE came ONLY to the lost sheep of the children of Ysryl. You christians really do have a lot to answer for, and pay you will. But first, it will begin with the loss of your nation's power....the darkness follows.

  • Andrew Winkler  - Beautiful Jewish diversionary tactic

    This schmack Talmudist is trying to make us believe that the Judaic term of 'Gentiles' is actually not referring to the less than human non-Jews but Jews from a different Jewish state. Yeah right... Go back, kid, study your Jewish hate literature for another 25 years and try again...

  • W. Boo

    Read the article ... it reminded me of Will and Ariel Durant and their tortured secular explanations of Christ in history ... which is ironic, considering their career was a Jewish twirled, whirled history hoax. But its influence was far reaching, as your essay shows.
    You know what you are doing when you deny The Lord and Savior Jesus Christ of Nazareth. I don't admire that, but It's the integrity and rectitude of the scholarship of your article which I questioned not your faithlessness. I have the same complaint about your oxymoron essay. If you haven't reviewed Jewish enmity to Christians - "A maelstrom indeed ensued when Claudius was succeeded by the Emperor Nero who, in A.D. 64, launched the fierce persecutions of Christians that would continue for two hundred and fifty years. A World History website ascribes the Great Fire of Rome to Jewish fanatics, who shifted the blame to the Christians" - and the Jewish infiltration of the Roman Church, lately, here's a place to refresh your information:
    http://watch.pair.com/mystery-babylon.html and another http://www.reformationsa.org/ and another http://www.reformation.org/
    Concerning the origin of Islam, I believe this is the view which is better informed and better supported by evidence: Walter J. Veith Islamic - Catholic Connection - Full Lecture
    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9zvYTpf0qC0
    Congratulations on a great site. If there weren't so much truthful and accurate information here, this particular opinion article would not seem so out of place.

  • W. Boo

    This opinion article really embarasses the author's reputation and the site, because it contains statements which are untruthful, according to Christian scripture. All eleven of the faithful disciples of Jesus of Nazareth were apostles for him to the Jews. Paul was the sole apostle to the gentiles, but he also taught in the synagogues of the towns to which he traveled. This is not my opinion, but the record from Paul's own letters and from the book, The Acts of the Apostles.
    It is one thing for the author to have an antipathy to Christianity. That's his private business and only The Grace of the Lord Jesus can overcome it. But it is quite another thing for him to injure the site and all its contributors by publishing false statements in angry ignorance. He ought to withdraw this particular essay.

  • I. Anon  - Rebel Site Lies

    The books of the New Testament should be added to the suggested reading for this article, so that the reader can discover what a complete liar it's author is. How strange to find this article published here, because as it carries lies for them, it is better for the Jews than lies on this subject of their own telling.
    Paul, the apostle of Jesus of Nazareth, the Christ, was mobbed by the Jews in Jerusaleum who intended to kill him for preaching the gospel to them. He was taken into custody by the Romans on the accusation of the jews and sent to Rome, where he was beheaded for the faith.

  • Andrew Winkler  - Re: Rebel Site Lies

    A lot of Jewish gatekeepers get attacked by overzealous tribesmen, which only adds to their smokescreen. Just think of Finkelstein, who lost his job over his criticism of the Holocaust industry. He's still a classic gatekeeper because he doesn't touch on the real issues of the Holocaust as raised by the likes of Arthur Butz, Robert Faurisson, Germar Rudolf and other revisionists.

Write comment
Your Contact Details:
Comment:
[b] [i] [u] [s] [url] [quote] [code] [img]   
:angry::0:confused::cheer:B):evil::silly::dry::lol::kiss::D:pinch:
:(:shock::X:side::):P:unsure::woohoo::huh::whistle:;):s
:!::?::idea::arrow:
Note:The views expressed and the links provided on our comment pages are the personal views of individual contributors and do not necessarily reflect the views of the Rebel Media Group.